![]() ![]() Since in my target system i can put a GTX1060 video card (Pascal microarchitecture, two generations ahead) my last question is: do you know if the Nvidia Pascal microarchitecture h.264 encoder has better performance regarding the artifacts problem? Kepler H.264 encoding is fast enough for my needs but rendering is not perfect (because of the well-known problem of the artifacts). It happens that my zbook is based on a nvidia quadro of the kepler family so i was able to make some tests. To make available hardware accelerated h.264 encoding to the NoMachine server i have to add to my system a nvidia video card of the Kepler architecture at least. What i meant to say is: since i’m using as NoMachine server a board based on Xeon E3, without anything gpu but the HD530 integrated inside the xeon, NoMachine can exploit only the h.264 software encoding. The H.264 encoding is available even at resolutions greater than 1920×1080 because, as you suggested, i set to false ‘Switch to software decoding…’ option. ![]() I can see that NoMachine is using H.264 encoding (by using Ctrl-Alt-0 on the client and by checking the sessions logs as well). Yes, i read the documentation and i installed the libraries properly. could i have significantly better performances with a dedicated video card? Do you have any advice? I made a little application based on this parameters and it looks NoMachine is close to its limit (H.264 at 10Hz could be the only one suitable). My remote desktop should (fluidly) show a 2000×1000 waterfall spectrogram refreshed at least every 100msec (preferably 30msec). What kind of logs do you need to examine the problem? both sides or the client side only?Īccording to my tests, it seems that VP8 quality is lower than H.264 (all other things being equal) do you confirm that? Server: NoMachine 5.3.10 on ubuntu 16.04.01 (hardware: board based on Xeon E31505M v5).Ĭlient: NoMachine 5.2.11 on windows 7 (hardware: pc zbook 17 with i7-4600M and video card nvidia quadro K3100M). When i go over this resolution the client falls back to VP8. I’m using for evaluation your Workstation version.īasically, I have the same problem described in this topic : i can’t use h.264 codec at resolution higher than 1920×1080. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |